Showing posts with label Balboa Theater. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Balboa Theater. Show all posts

Thursday, January 12, 2017

2016 By the Numbers

I saw 321 "films" on a theater screen in 2016. For these purposes, a film is not just a feature length film but also includes programs (typically from film festivals) which consist of multiple short films. If it was categorized as a single program in a festival guide, it counts as one film entry on my list. Conversely, I saw several programs which consisted of a short film and a feature length film. For my counting purposes, those are counted as a single film entry.

My annual film totals for the past few years are:

2010 - 385 films
2011 - 406 films
2012 - 436 films
2013 - 397 films
2014 - 388 films
2015 - 336 films
2016 - 321 films

For four consecutive years, I have seen fewer films than the previous year.

§§§

The top 10 venues in which I saw films in 2016 were:

1)  Roxie Theater (72 films) - 15 films from IndieFest, 12 films from DocFest and 10 films from various Elliot Lavine and Mid-Century Productions events.  I should acknowledge Elliot Lavine who is moving (to Portland?) and will no longer be programming films in the Bay Area.  The Roxie Theater was my #2 film-going destination from 2013 to 2015.

2) Castro Theatre (65 films) - 15 films from Noir City and 21 films from two Silent Film Festival events.  The Castro Theatre was my #1 film-going destination from 2013 to 2015.

3) Vogue & Balboa (25 films) - 13 films from the Mostly British Film Festival and 7 films from New Italian Cinema.  The Vogue & Balboa are operated by the same people.

4) Landmark Theaters (24 films) - 13 films at the Embarcadero (SFFS Hong Kong Cinema), 7 films at the Opera Plaza & 4 films at the Clay.  I did not see any films at the Aquarius or Guild on the Peninsula or any at the East Bay Landmark Theaters.

5) Camera Cinemas (20 films) - all from Cinequest and all at the now defunct Camera 12 which closed in September.  I did not see any films at the Camera 3 or Camera 7 Pruneyard.

5) Alamo Drafthouse Cinema (20 films) - buoyed by the SF International Film Festival's move from the Filmore to the Mission.

7) Viz/New People (14 films) - 9 films from the Japan Film Festival of SF and 3 films from Another Hole in the Head.

8) Crest Theater (11 films) - this Sacramento theater made the top 10 list due to three trips.  For the first time, I attended both weekends of the Sacramento French Film Festival in June and I attended the Sacramento Mini French Film Festival in November.  These two festivals accounted for all 11 films.

9) Great Star Theater (8 films) - CAAMFest and the Not Just Hong Kong Film Festival accounted for the 8 films.

10) Sequoia Theater (7 films) - I saw 7 films as part of the Mill Valley Film Festival at this theater.

Honorable Mentions:  PFA (6 films), California Theater in San Jose (6 films; all Cinequest), Victoria Theater (6 films; all SFIFF), Lark Theater (6 films; all MVFF), San Jose Rep (5 films; all Cinequest), New Parkway (5 films), 4 Star (4 films), YBCA (3 films), Smith Rafael (3 films; all MVFF) and Oddball Films (3 films)

§§§

On 191 days in 2016, I saw at least one film. The 2016 breakdown is:

On 175 days, I saw zero films.
On 101 days, I saw one film.
On 69 days, I saw two films.
On 9 days, I saw three films.
On 6 days, I saw four films.
On 5 days, I saw five films.
On 1 day, I saw six films.

On December 3 (Saturday), I watched six films at the San Francisco Silent Film Festival Day of Silents at the Castro Theater.

On both March 6 (Sunday) and March 12 (Saturday), I saw five films at Cinequest.  On June 4 (Saturday) and June 5 (Sunday), I saw five films at the San Francisco Silent Film Festival.  On June 18 (Saturday), I saw five films at the Sacramento French Film Festival

Breaking down the number of films by month:

January - 25 films
February - 33 films
March - 45 films
April - 22 films
May - 30 films
June - 40 films
July - 32 films
August - 4 films
September - 14 films
October - 22 films
November - 31 films
December - 23 films

The 4 films I watched in August represents the lowest monthly film total since I started this blog.  August is the busiest month of the year at work for me.  I have been in my current job since September 2012 so 2016 was my 4th "busy" August.  Looking at the last four years, the busy period seems to straddle August & September in the past but was largely confined to August this year.  That's because I decided to travel for Labor Day Weekend whereas in years past, I used that weekend to work. 

I saw 8 films in September 2015 but that number was depressed because I was standing deathwatch at my father's bedside.  Those are the only two calendar months when I watched films totaling in the single digits since January 2010.

Breaking down the number of films by day of the week:

Sunday - 57 films
Monday - 34 films
Tuesday - 30 films
Wednesday - 45 films
Thursday - 33 films
Friday - 49 films
Saturday - 73 films

§§§

2016 was the first year I did not see any films at the Kabuki Theater (which is no longer associated with Sundance Theaters).  CAAMFest and the SF International Film Festival abandoned the Kabuki for theaters in the Mission District (Roxie, Alamo Drafthouse & Victoria).

I also did not see any films at the Camera 3 in 2016.

Thursday, December 31, 2015

2015 By the Numbers

I saw 336 "films" on a theater screen in 2015. For these purposes, a film is not just a feature length film but also includes programs (typically from film festivals) which consist of multiple short films. If it was categorized as a single program in a festival guide, it counts as one film entry on my list. Conversely, I saw several programs which consisted of a short film and a feature length film. For my counting purposes, those are counted as a single film entry.

My annual film totals for the past few years are:

2010 - 385 films
2011 - 406 films
2012 - 436 films
2013 - 397 films
2014 - 388 films
2015 - 336 films

For the six years listed, 2015 had the largest year-on-year change of 52 films.  2015 was the first year since 2010 that I did not average one film per day.

§§§

The top 10 venues in which I saw films in 2015 were:

1) Castro Theater (88 films) - primarily the result of Noir City (19 films) and the SF Silent Film Festival (21 films over two festivals).  The Castro Theater has been my #1 film-going destination for three years in a row and four of the past five years.

2) Roxie Theater (55 films) - 11 films from A Rare Noir is Good to Find programmed by Elliot Lavine and 21 films between IndieFest & DocFest.  I'm counting the Roxie and Little Roxie as the same for these purposes.  The Roxie Theater has been my #2 film-going destination three years in a row and four of the past five years.

3) Vogue & Balboa (42 films) - 37 films at the Vogue and 5 at the Balboa.  The Vogue count was mainly due to the Mostly British Film Festival (17 films), the San Francisco Film Society's (SFFS) Hong Kong Cinema (6 films), SFFS' French Cinema Now (4 films) and SFFS' New Italian Cinema (4 films).  The Vogue & Balboa are owned and operated by the same people.

4) Camera Cinemas (29 films) - 25 films at the Camera 12, 3 films at the Camera 3 and 1 film at the Camera 7 Pruneyard.  I watched 24 films at the Camera 12 as part of Cinequest.

5) Landmark Theaters (18 films) - 9 films at the Opera Plaza, 8 films at the Clay and 1 film at the Aquarius.  I saw four films at the Clay as part of the 2015 San Francisco International Film Festival.

6) Four Star (15 films) - Mostly foreign films that weren't playing anywhere else or films late in their distribution run.

7) Kabuki Cinemas (14 films) - 9 films from SF International Film Festival (SFIFF) & 4 films at CAAMFest.

8) Crest Theater (11 films) - all films from the Sacramento French Film Festival.

9) California Theater in San Jose (10 films) - all films from Cinequest.

10) Stanford Theater and Viz (9 films each) - at the Viz I saw 8 films from the Japan Film Festival of San Francisco and 1 film at CAAMFest.  The Stanford was all rep house programs from their regular schedule.

The top 10 venues accounted for 89% of the films I saw this year.

Honorable Mentions:  YBCA (6 films) and the Sequoia Theater in Mill Valley (5 films).

I visited the Camera 7 and Alamo Drafthouse for first time in 2015.

§§§

On 208 days in 2015, I saw at least one film. The 2015 breakdown is:

On 157 days, I saw zero films.
On 118 days, I saw one film.
On 67 days, I saw two films.
On 11 days, I saw three films.
On 9 days, I saw four films.
On 3 days, I saw five films.

On both February 27 (Friday) and February 28 (Saturday), I saw five films at Cinequest.  On May 30 (Saturday), I saw five films at the San Francisco Silent Film Festival.

Breaking down the number of films by month:

January - 33 films
February - 46 films
March - 43 films
April - 28 films
May - 35 films
June - 35 films
July - 21 films
August - 29 films
September - 8 films
October - 19 films
November 27 films
December - 12 films

Comparing 2014 vs. 2015 to see when the large decrease occurred:

January (2015 minus 2014):  +1
February:  +5
March:  -11
April:  +2
May:  -10
June:  +10
July:  +1
August:  -1
September:  -13
October:  -7
November:  -11
December:  -17

I was three films behind my 2014 pace as of August 31, 2015.  In addition to being busy at work, September was the month when I decided my father's living situation could not continue and started taking actions to have him put in an assisted living facility.  My father passed away in October and during the last two months of the year, I traveled frequently to Las Vegas to settle his estate.

Breaking down the number of films by day of the week:

Sunday - 67 films
Monday - 41 films
Tuesday - 36 films
Wednesday - 41 films
Thursday - 32 films
Friday - 45 films
Saturday - 74 films

§§§

The PFA closed on August 2, 2015.  I only saw one film at the PFA in 2015.  The PFA reopens at their new location on February 3 with Ingmar Bergman's The Seventh Seal.  The new location is 2155 Center Street in Berkeley.

After a long delay, the Alamo Drafthouse New Mission opened in December 2015.  Only one auditorium has been in use but starting tomorrow the other four auditoriums become operational.

2015 is the first year I missed all screenings of Another Hole in the Head.  It coincided with one of my trips to Las Vegas.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Trainwreck

Last weekend, I saw Trainwreck at the Balboa Theater.  I had intended to spend some time reading and updating this blog at La Promenade Café which is across the street from the Balboa.  Seating was limited and when I finally got a seat some weird jackass with a directional microphone wouldn't stop asking me questions.  I finally got up and left.  I walked across the street and Trainwreck was starting in 15 minutes so I decided to take a chance.

Trainwreck starring Amy Schumer & Bill Hader; with Brie Larson, Colin Quinn, Tilda Swinton, Vanessa Bayer, Daniel Radcliffe, Marisa Tomei, Lebron James & John Cena; directed by Judd Apatow; (2015) - Official Website

Judd Apatow has his name attached to so many projects, it's hard for me to keep track.  Looking at his filmography, the only film which he directed that I've seen is The 40 Year Old Virgin. I'd never seen Amy Schumer before although I did read a memorable profile of her in GQ a couple of months ago.  Trainwreck has garnered mixed reviews.  My expectations were moderate going into the film.

Trainwreck is about Amy, a writer who works at a wonderfully trashy tabloid magazine.  Her personal life is a wreck mainly due to the influence of her father (Colin Quinn) who cheated on Amy's mother with regularity but without remorse.  At the beginning of the film, Amy has a boyfriend played by John Cena.  A sensitive athletic trainer with not-so-latent homosexual tendencies, he is a complete mismatch for Amy.

When Amy gets an assignment to profile an orthopedic surgeon (Bill Hader) who has developed a revolutionary technique, she is drawn to him despite their differences and her better judgment.  He's successful and nice...not a borderline alcoholic...and can count his sexual partners without the help of a database.  It's clear that Amy Schumer (also the screenwriter) has created the character of Amy as
flawed if not amusing lead character.  That fact that that type of character is female has drawn some commentary but I didn't find her gender to be that much of an issue.  Would I want to date the character of Amy?  Not in a million years but like in the film, she would be a source of endless amusement if you are not emotionally invested in her.

More interesting to me is the implication that the Amy in Trainwreck is a thinly veiled version of real-life Amy Schumer.  In the film, Amy's sister is named Kim (Brie Larson).  In real-life, Amy's sister is named Kim.  In the film, Amy's boyfriend is played by John Cena (a WWE wrestler) and they break up.  In real life, Amy Schumer ex-boyfriend is professional wrestler Dolph Ziggler.  There are several parallels between Amy's father & Amy Schumer's father.  The outrageousness of some of the scenes makes one wonder how much of a confessional Trainwreck really is.  Where does fact end and fiction begin?  It takes some courage on Schumer's part to put her life out there for comment although I doubt Schumer is a shrinking violet in her personal life.

Trainwreck follows several of the tropes of a romantic comedy with the typical Apatow flourishes which are slightly askew because they are performed by women (Schumer, sometimes Vanessa Bayer as Amy's coworker and Tilda Swinton who stands out as the overbearing editor at the magazine where Amy works).  Relegated to be Amy's sounding board is Brie Larson as Amy's married & reasonable little sister who lives in the suburbs.

A film like Trainwreck follows a formula - Girl Meet Boy, Girl Falls in Love with Boy, Girl Acts Like a Jerk, Girl & Boy Break Up and finally Girl & Boy Get Back Together.  The humor & originality in Trainwreck come from inverting the gender roles with respect to the traditional romcom.  Schumer gets to act like the lecher & Hader largely plays "the girl."  Set in New York City, Apatow & Schumer add numerous sports celebrities to punch up the film.  Hader's best friend is Lebron James playing Lebron James who is surprisingly invested in the specifics of romantic aspects of the relationship.  When they break up, James arranges an intervention for Hader's character with Chris Evert, Matthew Broderick & Marv Albert.

The laughs come moderately fast & mildly furious in Trainwreck.  Some gags fall short but Apatow, Schumer, et al. keep swinging away.  Daniel Radcliffe & Marisa Tomei turn up in a film-within-a-film called The Dogwalker - a romcom spoof which of course, Trainwreck also is.

Trainwreck was an entertaining evening.  If I had planned out the evening, I would have undoubtedly chosen a different film & likely would have not have regretted missing Trainwreck but as it turned the film was a modest serendipity.

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Artificial Intelligence in Two Films

I saw two films where artificial intelligence played a major role in the plot.

Ex Machina starring Oscar Issac, Domhnall Gleeson & Alicia Vikander; directed by Alex Garland; (2015) - Official Website
Avengers:  Age of Ultron starring Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Mark Rufalo, Scarlett Johansson, Jeremy Renner & James Spader; directed by Joss Whedon; (2015) - Official Website

I saw Ex Machina at the Vogue and Avengers at the Balboa.

The title of Ex Machina refers to the Latin phrase deus ex machina.  The literal translation means "gods from the machine" but it has come to refer to a plot device whereby a seemingly intractable problem is resolved by the introduction of a heretofore unmentioned character or unbelievable event which seems contrived.  An example would be one of the Superman films with Christopher Reeve.  I can't remember which one but Lois Lane is killed and Superman flies around the world in the opposite direction of the Earth's rotation.  He flies near the speed of light so that he can go back in time to the point when Lois is alive and thereby giving Superman time to save Lois.

That reference is a little strained with respect to the film but the film is open to quite a few interpretations.  Domhnall Gleeson is Caleb, a programmer at a Google like company that has over 90% of the internet search engine market.  He wins a lottery at work to spend a week with Nathan (Oscar Issac), the reclusive CEO of Caleb's company.  When he arrives at the remote but high-tech estate, Caleb observes strange behavior from Nathan but ultimately his curiosity is too much.  After signing some unusually restrictive non-disclosure agreements, Caleb is informed that Nathan is working on an artificial intelligence (AI) project and that Caleb will administer the Turing Test.  The Turing Test is a test to see if a machine can exhibit sufficient evidence of intelligence to fool the tester into thinking it is human or more precisely, to cause the tester to be unable to distinguish between machine and human.

Caleb is well qualified for this because he studied AI in school.  He is surprised however when he administers the test.  He is allowed to see the AI entity which is housed in an android named Ava (Alicia Vikander).  Ava has a human face but the rest of her is obviously robotic.  Caleb questions the validity of the test if he knows Ava is a robot but Nathan assures him that Ava can pass the standard Turing Test and that the more challenging test will be if Caleb thinks of Ava as human even if he can see that she is not.

The film progresses in a series of vignettes:  Caleb administering the test, followed by a debriefing with Nathan who is exhibiting signs of mental instability.  Periodically, a silent Japanese woman named Kyoko (Sonoya Mizuno) appears as a house servant and possibly Nathan's lover.  Her silence is explained by Nathan as being a byproduct of her inability to speak English.  That makes it easier for her to abide by the NDA terms.

Not only does Caleb begin to think of Ava as human but he falls in love with her.  She convinces him that Nathan is insane and dangerous.  Their interviews are recorded but Ava is able to reverse the flow of power into the compound which trips off the generator that supplies power.  During these outages, when the recording devices are inoperative, Ava confides her fears and concerns to Caleb who in turn withholds Ava's comments from Nathan.

The film has a claustrophobic feel because Nathan's compound is completely underground or at least has no windows.  Ava is kept a prisoner.  There is always a shatterproof piece of glass between Caleb and Ava.  She is also restricted to an area that Caleb cannot access.  Combined with a ominous soundtrack and Nathan's bizarre behavior, Caleb has reason to be concerned.  When Ava tells him not trust Nathan during one of the power outages, Caleb quickly complies.

Ex Machina raises many questions but for me the primary one is that if humans are unethical and imperfect, why would the AI systems we create not be unethical and imperfect.  You can talk about Asimov's Laws of Robotics but as they say, laws are made to be broken.  The film really hits its stride as the audience (at least me) starts to empathize with Ava...just like Caleb.  Of course, I know that I'm watching a film with an actress named Alicia Vikander playing the role of Ava but this was a film that was easy to suspend disbelief.  I quickly found myself identifying with Caleb's character and even wondering what I would do in his situation.

I won't give away the ending of the film but will say that I was surprised as I watched it but thinking about it afterwards, it was easily predicted.  I think I wanted to believe something was going to happen and when it didn't, it surprised me.  Ex Machina is one of my favorite films of the year.  Oscar Issac is developing quite a career since Inside Llewyn Davis which is about as far from the role Nathan as one can get.

§§§

I wasn't very interested in seeing Avengers:  Age of Ultron but I was in the neighborhood of the Balboa & had some time.  As I wrote in 2012 about The Avengers, "My favorite parts of the film occurred when the superheroes bicker with each other which is another way of saying Robert Downey Jr's snarky Tony Stark is the best thing about the film."  I could say the same thing about Age of Ultron.

Actually, I think I liked Ultron more than the original film.  The Avengers still bicker but now they are a team.  The highlight of the film was a party where they drunkenly take turns trying to lift Thor's war hammer while playfully teasing each other.  The actors seem to have settled into their roles which isn't surprising since this is the 11th MCU film.  The screenwriters have added some touches to give the characters a little more depth.  Black Widow has a thing for Dr. Bruce Banner (aka Hulk).  We also learn that she is sterile because her original spymasters wanted to make sure she never had children which could test her loyalties. Hawkeye has a wife & kids that no one except the Black Widow knew about.  Thor & Captain America have a serious bromance going on.  They even fight their battles as if they were long-time basketball teammates running a fast break.

All this adds some texture to the film but at 141 minutes, Ultron (like its predecessor) can be quite a slog.  The final battle has Ultron lifting a chunk of a fictitious Eastern European city into the air with the end goal of dropping the asteroid size piece from such a height as to cause a cataclysmic, species ending event (like the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs).  This scene took forever and I was antsy to leave the theater before it was finished.  Also, as the franchise continues it becomes clear that a passing knowledge of Marvel Comics is necessary to fully appreciate the films.  At the end of the film, they introduced some "new Avengers" who, it appeared were well-established in the MCU.  The first film I saw in the series was Iron Man in 2008.  My enjoyment diminishes with every subsequent film I see in the series.  What the hell are Infinity Stones which I have heard described as the MCU McGuffin?

I should mention the AI angle in Ultron.  Stark & Banner create an AI entity which is really a trap laid out for the Avengers.  That AI entity is Ultron (nicely voiced by James Spader) who first seeks physical form as an Iron Man like machine and later forces a Korean doctor into giving it human form.  The Avengers capture the biological entity before it is fully developed and implant Stark's program (JARVIS) into it.  Thus the Vision (a new hybrid entity) is created.  By the way, the Vision can lift Thor's hammer with ease.  Actually, Captain America budged the hammer which I suppose has some significance.  I guess I should also note that the Vision is further enhanced because he has one of the Infinity Stones implanted in his forehead.  It's the one from Loki's scepter as if I can appreciate the difference between the stones.  This is all very tedious to keep track of and even more tedious to write.

Robert Downey Jr. still has the best part as Tony Stark.  I sense that Chris Hemsworth is also injecting some humor into Thor and he assumes this great, authoritative speech pattern with Thor's dialogue which can be played straight or for laughs.  Mark Rufalo attempts to give Bruce Banner some poignancy which although effective seems out of place in a film like Avengers.

With that, I will say that if I had it over to do again, I would have skipped Avengers:  Age of Ultron and gone home to get an early night's sleep.

Friday, May 22, 2015

It's Only Rock 'n Roll (But I Like It)

I've been a watching a lot of musically (specifically rock 'n roll) themed films lately; most of them documentaries.

The Wrecking Crew!; documentary; directed by Denny Tedesco; (2015) - Official Website
Lambert and Stamp; documentary; directed by James D. Cooper; (2015) - Official Website
The Decline of Western Civilization; documentary; directed by Penelope Spheeris; (1981) - Official Website
Wayne's World starring Mike Myers & Dana Carvey; documentary; directed by Penelope Spheeris; (1992)
Gimme Shelter; documentary; directed by Albert Maysles, David Maysles & Charlotte Zwerin; (1970) - Official Website
Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out!; documentary; directed by Albert Maysles, Bradley Kaplan & Ian Marciewicz; (2009) - Official Website
Running Fence; documentary; directed by Albert Maysles, David Maysles & Charlotte Zwerin; (1978) - Official Website
Don't Think I Have Forgotten: Cambodia's Lost Rock and Roll; documentary; directed by John Pirozzi; (2014) - Official Website

§§§

I saw The Wrecking Crew! at the Landmark Opera Plaza.

I saw Lambert and Stamp at the Roxie.  It was a documentary about the two men who managed The Who.

The Decline of Western Civilization (TDoWC) & Wayne's World were part of a Midnites for Maniacs event at the Castro. Director Penelope Spheeris was in attendance.  There was a third film on the program - The Decline of Western Civilization Part II:  The Metal Years.  I might have stuck around for it but it was getting late.  TDoWC is a documentary of the LA punk rock scene in the late 1970s.  TDoWC Part II gives the same treatment to the heavy metal scene in the mid 1980s.  I assume Wayne's World needs no introduction although some people may be surprised to learn that Tia Carrere sang her own songs in the film.

Gimme Shelter & Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! were part of a weeklong Albert Maysles tribute film series at the Vogue.  The noted documentarian and nonagenarian passed away in March.  I only caught one evening of the series  In addition to Gimme Shelter & Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out!, the evening's program included Running Fence which was about Christo's Running Fence art project in Sonoma and Marin Counties in 1976.  Gimme Shelter was supposed to be a film about the Rolling Stones' 1969 US concert tour.  That tour culminated in a free concert at Altamont which ended in tragedy.  Not surprisingly, the film focuses on that concert.  Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! is a 27 minute film consisting of outtakes from Gimme Shelter.  Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! chronicles the Stones' performances at Madison Square Garden approximately a week before the Altamont concert.

Don't Think I Have Forgotten: Cambodia's Lost Rock and Roll is ostensibly a film about the rock & roll scene in Cambodia (mostly Phnom Penh) until the 1970s.  Any film set in Cambodia during that period has to address the Khmer Rouge genocide (aka the Killing Fields) of the late 1970s.

§§§

The Wrecking Crew was a nickname bestowed on a group of studio musicians in the 1960s and 70s.  There was never any formal membership to the group but the same people kept seeing each at studio recordings.  At the time, it was common for rock bands to  have their albums recorded by other musicians.

Directed by the son of Tommy Tedesco (a guitarist in the Wrecking Crew), the film is fairly paint-by-numbers.  However, the sheer volume of famous songs attributed the Crew was amazing.  It seemed like every hit record coming out of LA featured the uncredited music of the Wrecking Crew.  To say The Wrecking Crew! has a tremendous soundtrack is an understatement.

The film has been kicking around since 2008.  I believe the director has launched several successful fundraising campaigns for post-production.

§§§

Kit Lambert & Chris Stamp (Terrance Stamp's younger brother) were co-workers at a movie studio.  They decided to make a film together and despite knowing nothing about the rock-n-roll scene.  They set their sights on making a film about an up and coming rock-n-roll band.  The only problem was finding the band.  After some unsuccessful club hopping, Lambert & Stamp discovered the High Numbers who later became The Who.  The film wasn't too interesting for me until halfway through.  Lambert who was gay, took an interest in Pete Townshend who had attended art school.  He encouraged Townshend to develop his songwriting but it's not until The Who hit it big and Lambert bought a palazzo in Venice and got hooked on heroin that things became interesting.

Lambert died in 1981 while Stamp passed away in 2012.  Among the band members, drummer Keith Moon died in 1978 and bassist John Entwistle in 2002.  I'm not sure when the footage in Lambert and Stamp was filmed but Stamp & guitarist Townshend get most of the screen time while singer Roger Daltrey appears sparingly.  The absence of so many of the many players diminishes the accomplishments and influence of The Who.  Also, by focusing on the managers of The Who, it seems like the film is focusing on the derivative instead of the actual function.  At times, the focus shifted from the managers to the band and vice versa.  I was not able to get into the film despite being a modest fan of the band.

§§§

The Decline of Western Civilization is one of these films I have heard about for years.  I don't recall seeing it play at any local theaters and it hasn't had a DVD release.  I had never seen it and as the years have gone by, my interest in punk rock (never very strong to start with) has diminished.  After seeing TDoWC, I can understand the appeal of punk rock and more importantly the energy the crowds took from the performances.  Director Penelope Spheeris filmed the club performances of a half dozen or so punk bands.  She interspersed interviews with the band members between the concert scenes.  Finally, she book-ended the film with interviews of fans and audience members.

Among the bands I recognized were the Circle Jerks, Black Flag and the Germs.  Two bands that I was previously unfamiliar with captured my interest.  Catholic Discipline, fronted by Frenchman Claude Bessy (aka Kickboy Face), had interesting stage presence and song lyrics.  Fear (which was a favorite of John Belushi and appeared on Saturday Night Live) was fronted by the antagonistically charismatic Lee Ving.  Ving, taunting the audience with homophobic insults, nearly causes a riot.  In other words, he captured the true spirit of punk rock.

If nothing else, TDoWC is interesting as a time capsule of a specific cultural movement which may be difficult for people to understand today.  The film doesn't have a strong narrative structure but the vignettes gives the audience a revealing look at a subculture which has faded.  As someone in the film stated, punk rock music has an elevated tempo of up to 200 beats per minute.  That fast tempo elevates the music audiences' energy and aggression.  It also elevates the film audience's interest.  I felt like I was watching wild animals perform mating and territorial rituals...from a safe distance.

There is something undeniable outrageous about these punk rockers.  You would think they would look tame after 35 years but they still retained their hard edges.  That's fascinating in and of itself.

Watching Wayne's World, I couldn't help but notice how Wayne & Garth's public access television show predicted podcasts and internet series by more than a decade.  Not having seen the film in many years, I was surprised at how much I forgot.  I remembered the main plot with Rob Lowe's evil television producer trying to coopt Wayne & Garth's brand as well as move in on Wayne's girlfriend (Tia Carrere).  I forgot that Laura Flynn Boyle was Wayne's stalker ex-girlfriend and that Ed O'Neill, Chris Farley and Alice Cooper were in the film and I had forgotten that.

To be honest, Wayne's World doesn't age well or perhaps more accurately, I haven't aged well.  What seemed funny and accessible when I saw the film in 1992 (age 23) didn't seem quite so funny and accessible in 2015.  I couldn't help but think that times are different.  I wondered what Wayne & Garth would be doing in 2015.  Jesse Hawthorne Ficks stated before the screening that Wayne's World and most of Spheeris' films deal with losers and outcasts.  I didn't think Wayne & Garth were losers or outcasts in 1992 but in 2015 they're not as cool as I remembered them being.  I think what bothers me is that, by extension, it means I probably was not as cool in 1992 as I remember.

Rob Lowe's performance stood out in the film.  Tia Carrere's Hong Kong accent was distracting.  I don't even remember her character being from Kowloon or speaking with an accent.  Myers and Carvey's performances were pretty much as I recall.

The centerpiece of the evening were the on-stage interviews with Spheeris by Ficks.  From what I had read about her, I was expecting Spheeris to be full of piss & vinegar but instead she came off more like a kindly, sexy grandma who smoked too much pot in 60s and 70s.  Joined by her daughter (who was instrumental in getting all three TDoWC films released on Blue Ray on June 30 and whose name I cannot recall), Spheeris seemed to be having the time of her life before a respectful and respectably sized crowd at the Castro.  For his part, Ficks seemed smitten with Spheeris.

I don't recall much of the interview.  The most colorful story involved Spheeris happening upon Richard Pryor while walking across the UCLA campus.  Pryor said he was looking for someone to direct his film.  Spheeris volunteered and the resulting film was Uncle Tom's Fairy Tale (1968).  According to Spheeris, the film was completed and Bill Cosby owns the only print.  However, this article alleges that Pryor's daughter "Rain and Spheeris somehow conspired to take the film out of Pryor's home" in the 1980s.  The article goes on to state that Spheeris had given the film print "to the Film Archive of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, where it presumably still sits there today."

An intriguing story indeed but Spheeris added a personal touch.  While filming Uncle Tom's Fairy Tale, Spheeris fainted on set.  When she came to, the first image she saw was Richard Pryor standing over her and he said "This bitch is pregnant!"  Spheeris assured him she was not but she was mistaken.  She was pregnant with her daughter; the same one who was on stage with her.

§§§

I'm not sure if I have seen Gimme Shelter before.  Certain scenes looked familiar but I have seen several documentaries about the 1960s which focus on the Altamont concert so they may have used some of the Maysles film.

Let me start by saying that I was familiar with Gimme Shelter's lofty reputation before viewing it a couple Saturdays ago.  After seeing it, I can state that Gimme Shelter is one of the best films I have seen in 2015.

Gimme Shelter captures several moments.  First, it captures the Rolling Stones at the peak of their musical prowess.  From the film, you get a sense of what an event a Rolling Stones concert must have been in the 1960s.  They were showmen and so many of their songs had a hook which was more powerful during a show than listening to the same song on a record player or radio.  When the Stones play the intro of Brown Sugar, it feels like your heartbeat is synchronizing with the beat and it is doubly so in Gimme Shelter.

In 2013, I saw a documentary called Muscle Shoals.  From that film, I learned that the Rolling Stones recorded Brown Sugar at Muscle Shoals.  What I didn't realize was that it was recorded between December 2 to 4, 1969.  The song had its live performance debut on December 6, 1969...at Altamont.

Gimme Shelter is elevated to greatness by the footage at Altamont.  The day progresses ominously as there are incidents involving the Hell's Angels.  There were several big name acts before the Stones came on stage - Santana, Jefferson Airplane, The Flying Burrito Brothers, and Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.  The Grateful Dead were scheduled to appear but refused to take the stage due to the violence.  These periodic outbursts of violence by the Hell's Angels are captured on film.

By the time the Rolling Stones takes the stage, the film makes it feel as though a riot is about to break out.  Subtly, the Brothers Maysles shift the perspective.  Up until them, the film featured shots from the audience looking at the stage and from the stage looking at the audience.  The Stones waited until evening to perform.  The night further added to the ominous look.  Apparently, some "bad acid" had been passed around Altamont that day.  The crowd and the Hell's Angels seemed fed up with each other.  The most disturbing aspect was how close the crowd was allowed to get to the stage.  On top of that, the stage was not elevated enough to create a sufficient barrier and the topography of the area was such that the stage was at the bottom of a hill so the audience "held the high ground."

From their first song, the crowd became restive.  Jagger repeatedly asks the crowd to calm down and back up.  As the trouble continues, he asks everyone to calm down meaning the Hell's Angels as well.  As the crowd's movements ebb & flow and the Angels periodically scatter a section of the crowd with swinging pool cues, you can sense Jagger becoming uneasy.

But the money shot is still to come.  Meredith Hunter, in a lime green suit, is clearly visible in the film.  There is footage of him drawing his gun (the barrel is clearly visible) and of a Hell's Angel appearing to stab him in the back.  All this goes on while the Stones are playing Under My Thumb.

If this had been the entire film, it would have been a powerful documentary.  However, the Maysles were able to get Mick Jagger & Charlie Watts into the editing room where they watch the footage of Hunter being stabbed.  Jagger rushes out, mumbling "Well that's it" while he has a glazed look on his face.  The film ends with a freeze on Jagger's face with his glassy eyes.

The total effect of the film is unsettling to say the least.  My emotions swung wildly from grooving with the music to feeling a sense of dread as the events at Altamont unfolded.

Running Fence suffers in comparison to Gimme Shelter which any film would.  Less than an hour, Running Fence tells the story of artists (and spouses) Christo and Jeanne-Claude efforts to build a temporary fence 24 miles long in Sonoma & Marin Counties in 1976.  Encountering difficulties with certain land owners, various governmental agencies and skeptics, Christo & Jeanne-Claude eventually persevere.  I think because a) I knew the fence was built before seeing the film and b) the significance of the installation seemed fleeting (or even trivial at the time), the subject matter didn't really seem to justify a documentary.

Two items from the film piqued my curiosity.  First, are there still cattle & dairy ranchers in Sonoma & Marin Counties?  I know Clover Stornetta has dairy properties in the area but the ranchers in the film seemed to be small family operations for whom the presumably small payments by Christo & Jeanne-Claude had surprising significance.  I wondered if the route taken by the Running Fence is now grape vineyards.  The second item is one of legality & ethics.  In the film, a state agency (California Coastal Commission?) ruled that Christo & Jeanne-Claude were prohibited from having the fence end in the Pacific Ocean due to environmental concerns.  There was never any footage to show that decision being reversed but in the film, Christo supervises the installation of the fence into the Pacific Ocean.  I wondered if there were any repercussions.

Running Fences entering the Pacific Ocean
Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! was made nearly 40 years after Gimme Shelter and consisted of outtakes from the filming of Gimme Shelter. Only 27 minutes long, Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! consisted of footage from a photo shoot with Mick, Charlie & a donkey on a cold day and concert scenes from Madison Square Garden with Jimi Hendrix in the dressing room and Janis Joplin singing and clapping from the stage wings.

Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! (the Stones released a 1970 live album by the same name which featured performances from the same Madison Square Garden concerts shown in the film) probably gives an idea of what Gimme Shelter would have looked like if not for Altamont. As a companion piece to Gimme Shelter, Ya-Ya's doesn't add much except to further confirm the stage presence of the Rolling Stones.

§§§


There was a surprisingly large number of people at the Balboa on a Tuesday night when I saw Don't Think I Have Forgotten: Cambodia's Lost Rock and Roll.  I can't believe there is that much interest in Cambodian music.  Don't Think I Have Forgotten was directed by John Pirozzi, who also directed Sleepwalking Through the Mekong (2007), a film about Los Angeles based band Dengue Fever whose lead singer Chhom Nimol is Cambodian.  The band travels to Cambodia so that they can (re)connect to the musical and cultural roots.  Pirozzi seems to have an interest in mid-20th century Cambodian music.

As I mentioned before, any film set in and/or chronicling Cambodia in the 1970s has to address the Khmer Rouge mass murders. In this case, musicians and singers fared even worse than their countrymen.  The Khmer Rouge believed in an agrarian society and artists such as musicians and singers were specifically targeted for execution despite their popularity and fame within Cambodia.

The film was satisfactory but the repeated introduction of singers whom I had never heard of made it hard for me to maintain interest or follow the interviews.

Monday, January 5, 2015

Nightcrawler

Nightcrawler was a late addition to the line-up at the Mill Valley Film Festival.  I was not able to see it there but it stayed on my radar.  It didn't seem to get much press and Box Office Mojo confirms that it did modestly well in ticket sales.

I'll digress for a moment.  Of the top 100 grossing films in 2014, I saw ten:

#1 Guardians of the Galaxy
#2 The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
#17 Gone Girl
#19 Neighbors 
#33 Fury
#52 The Grand Budapest Hotel
#82 Nightcrawler
#83 Chef
#94 Birdman
#95 Boyhood

My movie going tastes are obviously not in sync with mainstream audiences.  Of the top 100 grossing films in 2014, it's not until #15 (Interstellar) that I see a film that I'm even remotely interested in and it is not until #73 (St. Vincent) until I see a film that I would regret missing.

According to Box Office Mojo, the top 10 films of 2014 are:

#1  Guardians of the Galaxy - I saw this film based on a co-worker's recommendation and was slightly disappointed; great soundtrack.

#2  The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 - I saw this film to support the Balboa Theater and was greatly disappointed.

#3  Captain America: The Winter Soldier - I remember this film coming out but had no desire to see it.

#4  The LEGO Movie - I do not remember this film coming out.

#5  Transformers: Age of Extinction - I get all the Transformers films confused.  I haven't seen any of the films in this series.

#6  Maleficent - Snow White tale with Angelina Jolie sporting some massive horns

#7  X-Men: Days of Future Past - I get all the X-Men films confused.  I stopped watching after the second film in the series.

#8  Dawn of the Planet of the Apes - I get all the PotA films confused (except the original).  I stopped watching after the one with James Franco & Freida Pinto.

#9  Big Hero 6 - I have no idea what this film is about and I don't even remember seeing commercials for it.

#10 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - who plays Spider-Man now?  Emma Stone is the love interest.  I've never seen one of these films in a movie theater.  I remember Willem Dafoe as the Green Goblin and Alfred Molina as Doc Oct but that was with Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker.

What I find amazing about the top 10 list is that is that four of the films are based on characters developed by Marvel Comics in the 1960s or as they say part of the MCU.  Six of the films are part of a franchise; maybe seven if Guardians of the Galaxy is the first in a series.

§§§

On the last Sunday in December 2014, I went to the New Parkway to see Nightcrawler.  I briefly considered sticking around for The Interview but it was 45 minute until showtime so I decided to go home.

Nightcrawler starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Rene Russo & Riz Ahmed; directed by Dan Gilroy; (2014) - Official Website

§§§

Like most people in the Bay Area, I am aware that there have been a lot of protests in Oakland lately.  Many of the protests have devolved into mini-riots and vandalism.  I noticed a lot of boarded up windows on Broadway as I walked from 19th St. BART to 24th St. where the New Parkway is located.  Twice in December, I've been on BART trains when service was halted or delayed due to protesters storming BART stations.  That was definitely on my mind as I went to Oakland.  As I walked back to BART around 7 PM, I noticed a lot of the restaurants in the area were open which is good sign.

When going to that part of Oakland, I try to get a sandwich at Ike's or a bite at Sweet Bar.  I've been meaning to stop at Umami Burger and Luka's Tap Room.  I recall getting an email from the New Parkway announcing that they had revamped their menu so I decided to have an early dinner at the theater.  I ordered the pasta of the day which was orecchiette with chicken & mushrooms.  It was very good.  The New Parkway has also revamped their food delivery system.  Instead of a punchcard type reader on each table, you now receive a more traditional pager type device which you lay on the table.  It flashes green when the food is ready so that the servers can see you.

I noticed they have a new facade and signage at the New Parkway since my last visit this summer.  Also, there was a large parking lot across the street from the New Parkway which is now well on its way to becoming multi-family housing.

§§§

Nightcrawler is the story of Lou Bloom (Jake Gyllenhaal).  As the film starts, he is stealing some copper wiring from a construction site.  It's clear that Bloom's entire subsistence is based on illegal activities.  What he lacks in ethics & formal education, Bloom makes up for with intelligence, ambition, hard work & emotional detachment.  He finds that these qualities serve him well as a freelance news photographer or stringer.  Bloom is the type of man who has no qualms about filming a person dying from an car accident.  Not only can he film that person dying but he is impervious to pleas of assistance from the injured...like those paparazzi who filmed Princess Diana as died in Paris.

Bloom moves from filming car accidents to staging the scenes to tampering with crime scenes to finally, manipulating the police into dangerous confrontations while he waits with camera in hand.  As distasteful as his actions are, the truly disturbing part of Bloom is his behavior when not filming crime scenes.  He essentially exploits a homeless man (Riz Ahmed) to be his "protégé."

The most fascinating parts of the film is his relationship with Nina Romina (Rene Russo), the morning news director of a local television station whom Bloom sells to exclusively.  At the beginning, Bloom is neophyte and lacks bargaining power.  As Bloom learns the ropes and eliminates his competition, he comes to realize that his video clips are improving the station's ratings.  In a super creepy scene, Bloom extorts Romina into a sexual relationship.  As the scene progresses, we see the power shift from Romina to Bloom as Romina & the audience realize they have underestimated Bloom's intelligence and his lack of scruples.

There are two lines of dialogue that stand out from the film.  At one point, Rick (Ahmed) has had enough of Bloom's abuse and legally dubious behavior.  He tells Bloom that Bloom doesn't understand people and doesn't know how to talk to people.  Bloom allows the comment to pass but a few minutes returns to the topic by saying "What if my problem wasn't that I don't understand people but that I don't like them? What if I was the kind of person who was obliged to hurt you for this? I mean physically."

Towards the end of the film, Bloom removes all doubt as to who is the dominant one in his relationship with Romina.  Out of the blue for Romina and the audience, Bloom unleashes this withering takedown in a monotone voice.  "Now I like you, Nina. And I look forward to our time together. But you have to understand, fifteen thousand isn't all that I want. From here on, starting now, I want my work to be credited by the anchors and on a burn. The name of my company is Video Production News, a professional news-gathering service. That's how it should be read and that's how it should be said. I also want to go to the next rung and meet your team, and the station manager, and the director, and the anchors, and start developing my own personal relationships. I'd like to start meeting them this morning. You'll take me around, you'll introduce me as the owner and president of Video Production News, and remind them of some of my many other stories. I'm not done. I also want to stop our discussion over prices. This will save time. So when I say that a particular number is my lowest price, that's my lowest price and you can be assured that I arrived at whatever that number is very carefully. Now, when I say that I want these things, I mean that I want them and I don't want to have to ask again. And the last thing that I want, Nina, is for you to do the things that I ask you to do when we're alone together in your apartment, not like the last time."  Only at the end when he makes reference to the Nina's sexual resistance do we here the slightest bit of irritation in Bloom's voice.

Gyllenhaal is absolutely incredible in the role of Lou Bloom.  It's as if Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver read some self-improvement books and tried to become an entrepreneur.  Indeed, Bloom operates strictly at night like Bickle which makes the mood more eerie.  Gyllenhaal lost 20 pounds for the role so he has a gaunt look which makes him look more menacing.  Gyllenhaal's greatest accomplishment is that he can deliver the line with barely an inflection but convey a very menacing tone.  He uses his hollowed face and piercing eyes to great effect.

Rene Russo shows quite a bit of range as a hardened news veteran barely concealing her desperation.  She thinks she has gotten a break by meeting Bloom but in hindsight, it seems Bloom had targeted her - the news director on the vampire shift at the end of her contract with the lowest rated TV station in LA.  Bloom is like a drug dealer.  He pushes his videos on her until she is hooked and then he shows no mercy.  Money is not enough; he has to drain her of every last drop of her dignity.

Finally, the scenes where Gyllenhaal & Riz Ahmed are in the car; waiting for a story to break or on their way to a story have a understated metaphysical quality to them. The simplistic Rick is concerned with existential matters while Bloom exhibits solipsism to the extreme with his egocentrism and lack of empathy.  The contrast between the two bring their flaws more into focus.

Nightcrawler is a tremendous film.  It's one of the best films I saw in 2014.

Thursday, January 1, 2015

2014 By the Numbers

I saw 388 "films" on a theater screen in 2014. For these purposes, a film is not just a feature length film but also includes programs (typically from film festivals) which consist of multiple short films. If it was categorized as a single program in a festival guide, it counts as one film entry on my list. Conversely, I saw several programs which consisted of a short film and a feature length film. For my counting purposes, those are counted a single film entry.

My annual film totals for the past few years are:

2010 - 385 films
2011 - 406 films
2012 - 436 films
2013 - 397 films
2014 - 388 films

For two consecutive years, I've seen less films than I did the year before.  With five years of data, it appears that 2012 was the outlier.  The five year average is 402.4 films per year.

§§§

The top 10 venues in which I saw films in 2014 were:

1) Castro Theater (86 films) - primarily the result of Noir City (18 films) and the SF Silent Film Festival (20 films over three festivals).  The Castro Theater has been my #1 film-going destination for three of the past five years.  The Castro was #2 or #3 for the other two years.

2) Roxie Theater (56 films) - 25 films between two series programmed by Elliot Lavine and 16 films at IndieFest.  I'm counting the Roxie and Little Roxie as the same for these purposes.  The Roxie Theater has been my #1 film-going destination for two of the past five years and has been #1 or #2 for each of the past five years.

3) Landmark Theaters (31 films) - 12 films at the Embarcadero Center, 10 films at the Opera Plaza, 3 films at both the Guild and the Aquarius, 2 films at the Shattuck and 1 film at the Clay.  Unlike past years, the San Francisco Film Society (SFFS) did not hold any Fall Film Series at Landmark venues.  Everything I saw at the Landmark Theaters was a new release.  For the 2nd consecutive year, the Landmark Theaters finished at #3 on my list.

3) Vogue & Balboa (31 films) - 27 films at the Vogue and 4 at the Balboa.  The Vogue count was mainly due to the Mostly British Film Festival (12 films), SFFS' French Cinema Now (7 films), SFFS' Hong Kong Cinema (5 films) and SFFS' New Italian Cinema (2 films).  Although I think of them as separate theaters they are owned and operated by the same people.

5) Pacific Film Archive (29 films) - Hou Hsiao-hsien (11 films), Satyajit Ray (5 films) and Kenji Mizoguchi (5 films) series accounted from most of my visits.

6) Camera Cinemas (27 films) - 25 films at the Camera 12 and 2 films at the Camera 3.  I watched 22 films at the Camera 12 as part of Cinequest.

7) Stanford Theater (26 films) - I saw 6 films each at Frank Capra & Barbara Stanwyck series.

8) Kabuki Cinemas (20 films) - 17 films from SF International Film Festival (SFIFF) & 3 films at CAAMFest.

9) Viz (13 films) - 5 films from Another Hole in the Head, 3 films from SFIFF, 4 from the SF Japan Film Festival & 1 film from CAAMFest.

10) YBCA (11 films) - New Filipino Cinema (7 films) and Invasion of the Cinemaniacs (3 films) accounted for most of the activity.

The top 10 venues accounted for 85% of the films I saw this year.

Honorable Mentions:  4 Star (11 films), California Theater in San Jose (9 films), SJ Rep (7 films) and the Smith Rafael Film Center (6 films).

I visited the Los Gatos Theater, Vine Cinema & Alehouse and Magick Lantern for the first time in 2014.  I also saw a film at the Mechanics' Institute (Cinema Lit) for the first time.

In 2014, I did not visit Niles Essanay or Oddball.  

I haven't visited the Paramount Theater in Oakland since April Fool's Day 2012 (Napoléon)

§§§

On 240 days in 2014, I saw at least one film. The 2014 breakdown is:

On 125 days, I saw zero films.
On 138 days, I saw one film.
On 72 days, I saw two films.
On 20 days, I saw three films.
On 4 days, I saw four films.
On 6 days, I saw five films.

On January 25 (Saturday), I saw five films at Noir City.  On March 8 (Saturday), March 12 (Wednesday), March 15 (Saturday) and March 16 (Sunday), I saw five films at Cinequest.  On June 1 (Sunday), I saw five films at the San Francisco Silent Film Festival.

Breaking down the number of films by month:

January - 32 films
February - 41 films
March - 54 films
April - 26 films
May - 45 films
June - 25 films
July - 20 films
August - 30 films
September - 21 films
October - 26 films
November 38 films
December - 30 films

I'm surprised at how closely the numbers follow the same cyclical pattern as 2013.  July 2014 is noticeably lower than July 2013 but that is because the SF Silent Film Festival moved their festival from July to late May/early June in 2014.  However, I saw 45 films in May 2013 and May 2014 (the exact same number).

Breaking down the number of films by day of the week:

Sunday - 74 films
Monday - 33 films
Tuesday - 37 films
Wednesday - 42 films
Thursday - 62 films
Friday - 57 films
Saturday - 83 films

I would have expected Saturday & Sunday to have the most films but I'm surprised that Thursday came in third.  I'm a little surprised I saw more films on Saturday than Sunday as I am usually running errands on Saturdays.  I was expecting Friday to be the third place day but drop off from 2nd place to 3rd place (23%) is much greater than anticipated.

§§§

The PFA is closing mid-year in 2015 to move to their new location so I don't think the PFA will make my top 10 list for 2015.

The SJ Rep has closed but it appears the building is still vacant.  I wonder if Cinequest will be able to use the space for their festival.

The Magick Lantern has closed but its reopening seems imminent (cross your fingers).

The Alamo Drafthouse is scheduled to open at the New Mission Theater in 2015.  I notice the website has changed the opening from the 2nd quarter of 2015 to just 2015.  They've started hiring staff according to their Facebook page.  

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Balboa Hat Trick

Without realizing it, I went through the first 11.5 months of 2014 without visiting the Balboa Theater.  I rectified that by going three consecutive days to see three film.

I originally intended to see Birdman but I got the showtimes mixed up.  When I showed up, it was The Babadook which was screening.  I went back the next day to see Birdman and followed that up the day after that with The Hunger Games sequel.

The Babadook starring Essie Davis & Noah Wiseman; directed by Jennifer Kent; (2014) - Official Website
Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) starring Michael Keaton; with Edward Norton, Naomi Watts, Emma Stone, Amy Ryan, Andrea Riseborough & Zach Galifianakis; directed by Alejandro G. Iñárritu; (2014) - Official Website
The Hunger Games:  Mockingjay - Part 1 starring Jennifer Lawrence, with  Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hensworth, Woody Harrelson, Donald Sutherland, Julianne Moore & Philip Seymour Hoffman; directed by Francis Lawrence, (2014) - Official Website

§§§

I want to mention a few items.  I read that Century Cinema in Corte Madera was closing a couple of months ago.  I was informed recently that it is still in operation.  Apparently, a building moratorium has extended the life of the theater.

With The Interview in the news, I have new interest in seeing the film.  Frankly, I wasn't that interested but now that it has become a First Amendment issue and Sony pulling the film from distribution has been characterized as capitulation to terrorism, I may see the film more on principle than genuine interest.  The scandal may be a boom to independent cinemas since the major theater chains are refusing to screen the film.  The New Parkway and Camera 3 are showing the film starting on Christmas.

§§§

The Babadook, an Australian film, was a box-office flop domestically but has been a modest success internationally.  It's reputation was buoyed by a Sundance screening and widespread critical acclaim.  I typically don't like horror films but have to admit I greatly enjoyed The Babadook.  Essie Davis is Amelia, a harried single mother.  Technically, she is a widow as her husband died in a car crash while driving her to the hospital to deliver their children.  That child, Samuel (Noah Wiseman), is now six or seven years old and quite a handful.  Samuel is hyperactive, clearly in need of a father figure & socially awkward but what bothers Amelia the most is his obsession with an imaginary monster named Mr. Babadook.

A mysterious pop-up book about Mr. Babadook makes Amelia think the problem is Samuel reading habits.  However, the book returns after Amelia throws it away and eventually burn it.  Samuel's behavior becomes more disturbing and irritating.  Unable to sleep, I thought Amelia was going to be the real monster (like The Shining).  Eventually, Mr. Babadook reveals himself to Amelia & the audience and he reminded me a little of a silent film monster (The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari?).

My interest waned at the end when Amelia does battle with Mr. Babadook,  Up until that point, Essie Davis' performance as the exhausted Amelia whose patients and sanity are test was extraordinary.  Wiseman proved capable in his role.  He's the type of boy you want to slap across the face but yet, at some level, you feel sorry for this sad little boy who never knew his father.

The Babadook isn't a good horror film.  It is a good film period.

§§§

Birdman is one of the most critically acclaimed films on the year.  I heartily agree with the consensus reviews.  Michael Keaton and Emma Stone give noteworthy performances among a strong cast but it was Edward Norton who knocked it out of the park.

Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the film was the camera movements and blocking.  Mostly filmed backstage at a Broadway theater, the camera follows the constant movements of the actors.  The camera movement and a jazz score give Birdman a frenetic feel to match Keaton's anxious protagonist.  The older I get, the more I empathize with characters who suffer in not-so-quiet desperation such as Keaton's lead character.

§§§

I read all three novels in Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games franchise.  I saw The Hunger Games (2012) and it's sequel The Hunger Games:  Catching Fire (2013).  Unlike the novels, I'm losing interest with each subsequent film in the series.  The filmmakers have split Collins' third novel into two films so this year is The Hunger Games:  Mockingjay - Part 1 and next will see the release of The Hunger Games:  Mockingjay - Part 2...I may not see it when it comes out.

My opinion of Mockingjay may be due to the splitting of the novel into two films.  The film seemed flat at times.  Perhaps because I had read the novel & knew there would be two films, I was anticipating the breakpoint in the film.  The film required a fair bit of knowledge of the previous two films.  I would think that someone who hadn't seen the first two films or hadn't read the books would be utterly lost.  At times, I found myself trying to remember plot points from the previous films to make sense of a scene from Mockingjay.  I may have also turned up my nose at general release film.  The film also suffered in comparison to The Babadook & Birdman.

Whatever the reason, I was decidedly mild about Mockingjay.

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Eat Drink Film at the Los Gatos Theater but Maybe Not at the Alamo Drafthouse

Former Balboa Theater operator Gary Meyer has started a new online magazine called Eat Drink Film.  The name is self-explanatory.  Subscription is free.

The latest issue already has provided me with information I can use.  Arthur Dong, whose film Hollywood Chinese I enjoyed, has written a book titled Forbidden City, USA: Chinese American Nightclubs, 1936-1970.  Again, the title tells you exactly what the book is about.  The book can be purchased with a 15% discount until May 31.

In conjunction, the San Francisco Main Public Library is having an exhibit also called Forbidden City, U.S.A.: Chinese American Nightclubs, 1936-1970.  The exhibit runs until July 6.

The book & exhibit look fascinating to me.

§§§

In today's SF WeeklySherilyn Connelly reports that the long anticipated Alamo Drafthouse at the New Mission Theater may be delayed until 2015 if not cancelled.  The Alamo Drafthouse website is still stating that it is "slated to open during the third quarter of 2014."

After an impressive spurt of national expansion, the Alamo Drafthouse has seemed to retrench in the past year.  Plans for a Manhattan movie theater were cancelled last year.  Now the future of the SF Alamo venue is called into question.

I hope it opens here but I'm retaining a healthy skepticism.

§§§

The Los Gatos Theater, also long delayed, has re-opened.  It's official re-opening was May 2 but it held a few events in the preceding days.

Formerly operated by Camera Cinemas, it appears as though the Los Gatos is now independent.  The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is presently screening there.  I am anxious to see the interior of the theater.

Saturday, January 4, 2014

2013 Another Hole in the Head Film Festival

2013 Another Hole in the Head Film Festival ran for three weeks from November 29 to December 19.  The festival was held at the Balboa Theater from November 29 to December 4 and at the Viz from December 5 to December 19.

Before I forget, I found an interesting article about Jeff Ross. Ross is the founder of the San Francisco Independent Film Festival (aka IndieFest).  IndieFest is the first film festival to which I purchased a festival pass.  I can say IndieFest was my gateway drug to my current level of cinematic addiction.  I came across an article about the Santa Cruz Film Festival.  The article was interesting because it chronicled how the festival grew and eventually became too much for its founder and early volunteers.  Recently, the festival hired Jeff Ross to be its director and 2013 was the first year under Ross' laid back leadership.  I've never been to the Santa Cruz Film Festival.  I believe, I've only been to Santa Cruz twice in my life.  I'm kind of curious what it's film festival is like.

At first, I thought the HoleHead timing was problematic but in hindsight, it was a blessing in disguise.  I was out of town from November 29 to December 3.  While I was out of town, I was reading Jason Wiener's posts on HoleHead.  A most charitable sort of fellow, Jason was fairly negative about the festival in his posts.  Last minute changes in the schedule, butchered film prints and other mishaps marred the festival and seemed to sour Jason's opinion.

I'm not really into "horror, sci-fi, dark fantasy and exploitation cinema."  I guess a more accurate statement is that I have less patience with "horror, sci-fi, dark fantasy and exploitation cinema."   I get bored pretty quickly by these films.

I was going to buy a five film discount card but the staff at the Balboa had no idea what I was talking about.  So I ended up seeing seven films - two at the Balboa and I bought the five film pass when the festival moved to the Viz.

Jaws starring Roy Scheider, Robert Shaw & Richard Dreyfuss; directed by Steven Spielberg; (1975)
All Cheerleaders Die; directed by Lucky McKee & Chris Sivertson; (2013) - Official Facebook
Malignant starring Brad Dourif & Gary Cairns; directed by Brian Avenet-Bradley; (2013) - Official Facebook
Nuigulumar Z starring Shôko Nakagawa & Rina Takeda; directed by Noboru Iguchi; Japanese with subtitles; (2013) - Official Website
Evil Feed starring Laci J. Mailey; directed by Kimani Ray Smith; (2013) - Official Website
Cheap Thrills starring Pat Healy, Ethan Embry, Sara Paxton & David Koechner; directed by E.L. Katz; (2013) - Official Facebook
Face; directed by Taka Arai & Norith Soth; (2012)

The version of Nuigulumar Z  which screened had the title Gothic Lolita Battle Bear which I think is a better title.

Through luck and assiduously avoiding zombie films, I think I cherry picked the best HoleHead had to offer.  Cheap Thrills won the audience award and Evil Feed was the staff pick.

There were a few things weird about this year's HoleHead.  First, all of the films were scheduled to be screened once and only once.  You had one shot to see a film and that was it.  Reading Jason's blog, I vaguely recall they screened something twice due to schedule changes.  The other odd thing was that none of the screenings took place at the Roxie which has been one of the venues of every IndieFest, DocFest and HoleHead festival I can recall over the past decade or so.  The Roxie is the most conveniently located movie theater in the City due to its proximity to 16th St. BART.  I wonder why HoleHead didn't screen at the Roxie.  

§§§

What more can I write about Jaws?  I've seen it on television many times and enjoyed it immensely.  I was too young to see it on the big screen when it was released.  I do remember having a red Jaws T-shirt which was one of my favorites as a child.  I jumped at the opportunity to see it (in 35 mm!) on the movie screen.  The print was beat up but I loved the film as much as I ever did.

The best part of Jaws is the second half when Brody (Roy Scheider), Quint (Robert Shaw) and Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) are on the boat being hunted by the shark while simultaneously engaged in some male bonding rituals.  Shaw, in particular, draws your attention with harsh New England accent and the way he says "Hooper!"  Dreyfuss plays Hooper as conflicted about Quint, both admiring and frightened by his obsession with killing sharks.

The next evening, HoleHead screened a 35mm print of Stanley Kubrick's The Shining.  I was tempted to attend but I have to admit, I've never been a big fan of the film.  I'm glad I didn't go.  The print was so beat up that festival director George Kaskanlian felt the need to issue a public apology:

Hi guys this is George(Producer of the another hole in the head film festival), I am the one who should be held responsible for last nights horrible Shining screening. I want to say that I am very very very sorry about last nights screening. I knew it was an old print and I expected it to be a little beat up and worn down because of its 30+ years of being on the road but with all the constant snow and major key parts of the film missing/spliced was inexcusable. I should have watched the print that I rented from a big hollywood studio but there was no time. Im very sorry and hope you don't take it personal. We still have two weeks left of this amazing festival and I promise that The Shining Forwards and Backwards will be a pristine brand new immaculate copy with zero snow and zero film cuts. It's sad for me to think and say but last nights copy of the shining that yall witnessed needs to be put to rest and should have never been rented to the festival.

I went to the Balboa on the final night HoleHead was there with the intention of seeing All Cheerleaders Die and The Shining.  All Cheerleaders Die was the first film of the evening and was disappointing.  I was expecting a throwback sexploitation film.  Instead, I got a rehash of The Craft (which is one of my favorite horror films).  At the time, I didn't know this was a remake.  All Cheerleaders Die (2013) is a remake of All Cheerleaders Die (2001).  Same directors, different casts.  I can only wonder how good the original was.  The version I saw put me to sleep after an hour.  After an interesting setup featuring Felisha Cooper; the film goes limp.  Not much violence or nudity (gratuitous or otherwise).  Neither comedy nor horror, the film lost my interest well before it's 90 minutes were finished.

If All Cheerleaders Die were better, I may have decided to stick around for The Shining.  However, I didn't have the five film pass at this point and would have to pay $12 for the privilege of seeing a film I wasn't too keen on.  I decided to call it a night and go home.

§§§

I wanted to see a Japanese film called Sengoku Bloody Agent but I checked the HoleHead website the day it was to screen and saw that it had been pulled from the schedule.  Due to this, I wasn't sure if I could fill out five films for the discount pass.  Ultimately, I decided to get the pass.  Actually, there never was a pass.  They just wrote my name on piece of paper and tick marked it.  Even later, they didn't even bother to check my name.

The first film I saw at the Viz was Malignant - nine days after I saw All Cheerleaders Die.  Seeing and chatting with some of the festival regulars, I got the impression it had been a long nine days.

As I recall, Malignant was about an alcoholic man who is coping with his wife's death through copious consumption of alcohol.  A strange guy (Brad Dourif) shows up, inserts some medical device into him via surgery.  If he drinks alcohol, he become psychotic and people around start dying terrible deaths.  Interesting premise but the film was kind of plodding and lost my interest.  I was in and out of consciousness throughout the film.  I can't rag too much on Malignant.  I think it was a little too deliberately paced for horror film festival.

§§§

At this point, I was thinking about skipping the rest of the festival but decided to give Noboru Iguchi's latest film a chance.  At the 2008 HoleHead, Iguchi's Machine Girl was my favorite film of the festival.  Since then, I've seen three or four Iguchi films but none have lived up to Machine Girl but Nuigulumar Z was a fun ride.

I don't even know if the plot synopsis is necessary but here goes.  A planet is destroyed and the spirits of the inhabitants float to earth as dust.  One of the warriors lands on a teddy bear.  That teddy bear comes into contact with a Lolita girl (which incidentally is the theme of the cafe on the ground level of the building the Viz is located).  If you don't know about Lolita fashion, this website may help.

Shôko Nakagawa plays the Lolita as a sweet natured screw-up.  She is referred to by her teenage niece as Dameko which amusing if you know little Japanese.  Traditional Japanese names for women end in "ko;" kind of like female names ending with an "a" in the Spanish language. Dame pronounced "dah-may" means to be wrong or if said with enough gusto, "You fucked it up!"  Punning her name from Yumeko to Dameko, is kind of amusing or maybe I just feel full of myself because I picked up on Japanese wordplay in a film.

Anyway, when Dameko and the bear have a mind to, they merge into a single superhero, the eponymous Nuigulumar who looks like pink leather teddy bear.  Another speck of dust lands on earth and inhabit a man and he becomes bent on world domination.  Only Dameko/Nuigulumar can save the human race.  I think there were some zombies in there somewhere too.

Not quite as gratuitous as one would expect from a Japanese film of this genre, Nuigulumar Z has goofy sweetness to it.   Although Shôko Nakagawa portrays Dameko, when she transforms into Nuigulumar, Rina Takeda takes over for the action sequences.  Takeda plays Kill Billy, one of the evil henchman as well.

Shôko Nakagawa (left) & Rina Takeda in Nuigulumar Z
§§§

Buoyed by Nuigulumar Z, I decided to use up my 5 film pass.  Fortunately, two of the films which caught my attention when I first read the film program were screening on the third to last and penultimate days of HoleHead.

Evil Feed had a premise which could go either way.  I knew it was a film I would enjoy when the character Phat Phuk is introduced.  Presented as "fat fook," he corrects the hostess by saying it's pronounced "fat fuck."

The plot involves a fight club/restaurant which kidnaps the family members of martial arts experts.  That gives an incentive for the fighter when s/he goes up against one o the house gladiators.  All fights are to the death and patrons bid on the body parts.  The winner lives, the loser gets chopped and served to the restaurant patrons.  The house special is the Dickie Roll which looks like a fried sausage.

The nominal star is Laci J. Mailey as the kidnapped daughter of kung fu master.  She gives her captors more than they expected.  The film is more of an ensemble piece.  Alyson Bath steals the film as the nymphomaniac restaurant hostess.  She goes after her role with gusto which is another way of saying she is frequently nude.  Indeed, Bath and Derek Gilroy team up for a memorable scene where we see the process by which the Dickie Roll is prepared.

Terry Chen as the restaurant owner seems to be channeling Malcolm McDowell from A Clockwork Orange while Johnson Phan seems to be having too much fun playing a cocky kung fu fighter while doing a Bruce Lee impersonation.

Absurd, offensive and gratuitously violent - what more could you want from a HoleHead film?  Evil Feed was my favorite film of the festival.

§§§

The next night, I went back to see Cheap Thrills.  I get the definite sense I've seen this plot before but I can't place the film(s).

Pat Healy is Craig, a failed writer with a wife and child.  Laid off from his job at a garage and desperate for money, he stops in a bar where he encounters his high school friend Vince (Ethan Embry).  The two haven't seen each other for many years and after some awkward chit chat, they are approached by Violet (Sara Paxton) and Colin (David Koechner), a married couple celebrating Violet's birthday.  Quickly, Colin establishes the rules for the evening.  He will pay cash to Craig and/or Vince to do increasingly outlandish acts.  As the night wears on, Colin's dollar incentives increases as does the mayhem caused by the acts he requests.  Sex, dead dogs, severed fingers and murder ensue.  In the end, it turns out it was a $1 wager between Violet and Colin to see whether Vince or Craig would sink to such depraved depths.

Cheap Thrills was an interesting film.  We get to see the change in Craig and Vince.  As the dollar amounts increase, their behavior changes from one of former friends to rivals to deadly enemies.  The message is money is the root of all evil and as a double whammy, the evil Craig & Vince do is strictly for the amusement of Violet & Colin.

As the film progresses, the humor drains out and the audience is left with grim evidence of the cruelty of humans.

§§§

Not wanting to return for a third consecutive night, I decided to stick around after Cheap Thrills to see Face.  I was intrigued since Face was advertised as being produced by the same guy who produced V/H/S and V/H/S 2.   I liked both of those films and Face looked like more of the same.  Face is one of faux found footage films (say that three times quickly).  In this case, a sorority and fraternity have an annual Halloween ritual of scaring each other.  The "losers" have to do whatever the "winners" want.  The previous year, the frat boys won and, surprisingly, they chose sex with the sorority girls.  One of the girls was videotaped and the footage was posted to the internet.  That amps up the girls need for revenge.

The first half of the film is filmed from the perspective of the fraternity.  The second half is filmed from the perspective of the sorority which is the more "interesting" part of the story.  Cutting to the chase, the boys spike the liquor with hallucinogenics while the girls slip roofies or GHB into the pizza.  The result is the boys are rendered unconscious while the girls become increasingly unstable.  They eventually kills the boys and skin their faces hence the title of the film.

Face has an admirable concept but the execution was lacking.  After seeing it, I realized that one of the crucial elements of V/H/S and its sequel is that the "found footage" was only 10 to 20 minutes per segment.  Face's runtime was listed at 75 minutes and that was much too long.  In my opinion, Face would have made a nice 20 to 30 minute short film.  The shaky cam and large cast proved confusing to me also.  Toward the end, when the carnage was occurring, I had a hard time figuring out what was happening.  There is a nice shot at the end where a dog is wearing the skinned face of one of the frat boys but 75 minutes is a long time to wait for that money shot.

There is probably some social commentary in there about the hyper-aggressiveness and casual misogyny of young males in today's society but the underlying message and plot of Face was lost along the way.